Unemployment can be studied under the approach of psychology, sociology and economy, despite for this article we will take shape to the psycho-social causes. It does not have to be strange to us that it is indicated that unemployment is product of the nature of the man and the society in that it is lived. That an individual finds use or no, depends, besides the economic and social factors, of factors of psychological nature that very deserve to be taken into account that is to say: It brings back to consciousness individual. The ideal of many is not to work. A mystic becomes necessary of work, since the value of an individual is bound to the activity that exerts within the society. The psychic stability, that is to say the psychological traumas which had to lived experiences to a large extent, falls and even they annul the activity of the people. The atmosphere in which the person lives, talks about to if this one is unfavorable. The man does not have motivation to work or lacks average doing it.

The neoliberal system is to a large extent responsible for this situation. The dynamics of the individual, has to do that if the individual does not have interest, it does not look for use, does not obtain it loses or it. The intellectual and physical capacities, on the matter Surez, indicates that the deficiency of aptitudes closes to the person the doors of a use, this day to day is observed in our surroundings, where more and more demanding the requirements of knowledge and abilities. Nevertheless. Considrese that these capacities partly are acquired and depend on the culture. This as well, depends to a large extent on the opportunity that the society of a everyone. The character of the individual, that is to say that are conflicting people or with a complex that hardly obtains employment.

Public Debates

By: Oscar Rossignoli one of the questions that many public managers or general managers of the companies we have done is whether it is really necessary to maintain existing in the media, especially with regard to the topics that have to do with our company or our products and brands. Swarmed by offers, Drew Houston is currently assessing future choices. For example: when a company that passes unnoticed medially suddenly looks wrapped in a smear campaign where its officials are accused of many false negatives and this transcends big headlines to the media, what do? Is it that we forget the public opinion and opted to defend ourselves by a court anything else? Be careful! Public opinion can exert some influence even in the thinking of judges, not to mention the enormous damage that the corporate reputation could suffer. Best, then, is to take control of the agenda in the media always, always and always. What I want to dwell on time is that to do so it must be applied some principles that the great strategists of history have made popular: Machiavelli, Tsun Tzu, Robert Greene and Joost Elffers, among others. A topic of public debate in the media ideally exercise control. How? Through strategies and tactics we need to ensure that our opponents come to us and not us to them.

This is accomplished when our opponent talks about the topics we propose and not upside down. When we make your communication reactive to our and our proactive, we are taking control of the agenda without a doubt. When emotion is prepended to the strategic vision is when we started to make mistakes, and without realizing, we suddenly find ourselves making statements to the press on the topics of our adversary: from that moment they are making us agenda and we have lost control over the themes of public debate for letting us carried away by emotions.